In a concerning development, research into eating disorders has been defunded, despite the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) commission’s purported focus on chronic conditions. This move has sent shockwaves through the medical and research communities, raising questions about the prioritization of health issues and the future of treatment for those suffering from eating disorders.
The MAHA commission, established by President Trump to address the escalating health crisis in the United States, particularly childhood chronic diseases, released its first major report recently. However, the report has been heavily criticized for its near – complete omission of eating disorders. Amid numerous discussions about obesity and children’s diets, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge – eating disorder were not mentioned even once, except for a passing reference to disordered eating in relation to the benefits of family meals.
This is a significant oversight considering the growing prevalence and severity of eating disorders. These mental health conditions have been on the rise for decades, especially among young women and girls, and can have life – threatening consequences. A recent analysis revealed that individuals with anorexia are five times more likely to die compared to the general population. Moreover, adolescents with other chronic conditions are at a particularly high risk of developing eating disorders and dying from them.
The defunding of eating disorder research comes at a time when the field is already grappling with limited resources. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has terminated at least seven eating disorder grants, amounting to nearly $2.7 million, according to a Harvard – tracking team. The full scope of the cuts, including those from the National Science Foundation and targeted universities, remains unclear. However, these cuts represent a substantial portion of the total funding available for eating disorder research.
Christine Peat, the president of the Eating Disorder Coalition, emphasized the disproportionate impact of these funding cuts on a field that is already resource – strapped. Ariel Beccia, a post – doctoral researcher at Harvard, echoed this concern, stating that the relatively small amount of money involved represents a large percentage of the available funds for eating disorder research.
Tiffany Brown, the principal investigator at Auburn University’s ACCEPT lab, had to let go of one of her two full – time research coordinators after her grant was canceled. She anticipates that the timeline for her work on new treatment approaches will double without federal support. Her research, which aimed to develop innovative treatment methods for eating disorders, now faces significant delays, potentially depriving patients of much – needed advancements in treatment.
Emily Hilliard, a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), stated that the MAHA report “analyzes key drivers of the childhood chronic disease crisis — including poor diet” and that Secretary Kennedy believes the report provides a framework for reversing preventable illnesses, including eating disorders. However, critics argue that the lack of specific mention of eating disorders in the report and the defunding of related research do not align with this claim.
Researchers in the field are now scrambling to find alternative funding sources, such as private foundations, to continue their work. Despite the intense competition for limited funds, Beccia noted a strong sense of camaraderie within the research community, with researchers encouraging each other to apply for the same grants. However, the search for new funding is challenging, and many fear that the progress made in understanding and treating eating disorders will be severely hampered.
Existing treatments for eating disorders, often based on cognitive – behavioral therapy, have limitations. They have high dropout rates and varying remission rates. Researchers like Levinson are exploring new approaches using machine learning to personalize treatment based on individual patient data. However, without sufficient funding, these promising research directions may not be able to reach their full potential.
In mid – May, Peat and 140 other advocates traveled to Capitol Hill to advocate for $5 million to continue federal training for clinicians on eating disorder screening and intervention, plus $750,000 in research grants focused on early detection among women and girls. Their efforts highlight the urgent need for continued investment in eating disorder research and treatment.
The defunding of eating disorder research, despite the MAHA commission’s focus on chronic conditions, is a setback for the millions of people affected by these disorders. It not only impacts the development of new treatments but also the early detection and prevention efforts. As the research community continues to seek alternative funding and advocate for the importance of eating disorder research, the hope is that policymakers will recognize the significance of this issue and reverse the funding cuts, ensuring that those struggling with eating disorders have access to the best possible care and treatment.
Related topics：
