As scientists detect increasing amounts of microplastics in the human brain, new evidence suggests your favorite convenience foods may silently be harming your mental health—prompting urgent calls for further research and dietary changes.
A new perspective article published in the journal Brain Medicine emphasizes the potential role of microplastics in linking ultra-processed food consumption with mental health disorders.
Ultra-Processed Foods and Mental Health
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), including instant noodles, soft drinks, and packaged snacks, are made from substances derived from natural foods that are industrially formulated. These foods are high in artificial additives and are typically heavily packaged.
Globally—especially in high-income countries—consumption of UPFs is rising rapidly. In the U.S., they account for over 50% of total caloric intake. Convenience, affordability, accessibility, aggressive marketing, and lifestyle changes are driving the shift from whole foods to UPFs.
According to a comprehensive review published in The British Medical Journal and cited in the perspective article, people with high UPF intake face a 22% higher risk of depression, 48% higher risk of anxiety, and 41% higher likelihood of poor sleep quality compared to those who consume less.
Recent observational studies also link UPF overconsumption to poor sleep, worse physical health, depression, and anxiety. Further reports suggest that diets rich in whole, unprocessed foods may lower the risk of psychiatric disorders. Small randomized controlled trials, especially those involving Mediterranean diet interventions for depression, have shown moderate to substantial improvements in depressive symptoms. New intervention studies also underline the connection between diet and mental health.
Microplastics as a Contributing Factor
Mental health issues associated with UPFs may result not only from their poor nutritional profile and low energy density but also from the physical and chemical properties introduced during processing and packaging—such as bisphenol and microplastic contamination.
Like UPFs, microplastics can cause oxidative stress, inflammation, immune dysfunction, metabolic disruption, impaired cell growth and organ development, and even cancer.
In the brain, micro- and nanoplastics may raise the risk of neuropsychiatric disorders by inducing oxidative stress, damaging neurons, and interfering with neurotransmitters like acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate. However, it’s important to note that much of this mechanistic evidence comes from animal and cell studies—direct human data is still limited.
Dietary Sources of Microplastics
Due to how they’re processed and packaged, UPFs tend to contain high levels of microplastics. These foods are often stored or microwaved in plastic containers—a major source of contamination. For example, chicken nuggets may have 30 times more microplastics per gram than chicken breast, and microwaving plastic containers can release millions of micro- and nanoplastic particles within minutes.
Bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical used in plastic manufacturing, can also leach into UPFs when containers degrade. Some human studies have linked BPA exposure to autism and depression. This evidence suggests that overconsuming UPFs may increase microplastic and BPA accumulation in the body.
Microplastics in the Brain
Emerging data shows the presence of microplastics—mainly polyethylene—within the human brain. These particles are extremely small (less than 200 nanometers) and are 7 to 30 times more concentrated in the brain than in organs like the liver or kidney. One recent study found a 50% increase in brain microplastic levels from 2016 to 2024, which coincides with the global rise in UPF consumption.
People with dementia were found to have three to five times higher brain microplastic levels, though researchers stress that this correlation does not imply causation.
While some human studies suggest links between BPA exposure and autism, depression, and anxiety, no conclusive evidence currently ties microplastic exposure directly to mental health problems. This research gap partly stems from the difficulty of measuring microplastics in human brains and the ethical challenges of conducting direct exposure studies.
Implications for Dietary Interventions
Finding microplastics in the brain and body raises major health concerns. Several studies show their potential negative effects on immunity, genetic stability, and hormone regulation.
The SMILES trial was the first randomized controlled study to test whether dietary changes could treat moderate-to-severe depression. The intervention replaced UPFs with nutrient-rich whole foods. After 12 weeks, participants in the diet group saw significant improvement in depression symptoms: 32% reached remission, compared to 8% in the control group. That means for every four people who made dietary changes, one more person recovered from depression—an important statistic known as the “number needed to treat” (4.1).
Although the trial didn’t measure microplastic levels directly, researchers hypothesize that reduced exposure due to better diets may partly explain the improvements. However, this remains unproven and requires further research.
The article recommends conducting post-hoc analyses in such dietary trials to estimate changes in microplastic content and their effects on mental health as more food data becomes available.
Call for a New Dietary Risk Index
While the paper acknowledges growing efforts to quantify microplastic levels in various UPFs, it also notes that methods are not yet fully standardized. More research is needed to assess how dietary changes affect microplastic intake and mental health outcomes.
Several dietary indices already exist—such as the Dietary Inflammatory Index (measuring the inflammatory potential of food) and the NOVA classification (categorizing foods by processing levels). Inspired by these, the authors propose a Dietary Microplastic Index to evaluate the amount of microplastics in one’s diet and the associated health risks.
Currently, no public health surveys track microplastic intake, limiting our understanding of its long-term effects on mental health.
The global surge in UPF consumption—alongside the rise in mental health problems—highlights the urgent need for human-based research into how microplastics may be contributing.
Related Topics
